[00:00:01]
WELCOME TO THE MAY 3RD BOARD MEETING.
[1. Roll Call]
YES, SIR.WHY AREN'T YOU DONE THAT ALREADY HERE WE HAVE CORN.
[Additional Item]
TO MY ATTENTION BEFORE WE GET INTO THE NEW BUSINESS, MIGHT BE, GET A QUICK STAFF WHERE YOU'RE FROM THE OLD BUSINESS, THE DISCRETION OF THE LAND USE PLAN UPDATE.OH, WELL, YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO ADD THAT TO THE LAST ITEM OF BUSINESS.
SO IT'D BE THREE, A DISCUSSION ON THE MAPS.
SHOW YOUR ACTING DIRECTORS, MR. EDMOND CHAIR.
IF IT'S NOT OFFENSIVE TO THE BOARD, WE'D LIKE TO ADD THAT TO THE DISCUSSION.
I MAKE A MOTION WHERE YOU ADD A STAFF UPDATE OF THE LAND USE PLAN AS A AGENDA ITEM THREE EIGHT.
[2.A. Weyehaeuser NR Company (c/o McKim & Creed) are requesting final subdivision plan approval for “Thales Academy at West New Bern”. This property is located on approximately 8.86 +/- acres in the C-3 Commercial District. The site is located north of US HWY 70.]
ITEM A WAREHOUSER COMPANY, KEVIN CREED, OR REQUESTING FILED SUBDIVISION PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE SALES ACADEMY AT WEST NEWBURGH.THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE FOX AND THE 8.86 ACRES.
AND IT'S LOCATED IN A C3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTH OF US, HIGHWAY SEVEN.
THAT'S GOING, WE GET A STAFF REFUND.
YOU HAVE SET THE SITES LOCATED AT 70 IN WEST ONE LOCK.
THERE'S GOING TO BE 200 FEET OF POST PUBLIC STREETS AND THE CITY OF NEWBURGH.
SAME AS OUR LAST MONTH SITES CAN BE UP HERE.
UM, THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEIGHBOR YOU COMMITTEE, FEBRUARY 25TH, GENERAL PLAN APPROVAL FROM THE CITY NEIGHBORS BOARD ON APRIL 5TH.
STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL WITH ALL THE TECHNICAL AND LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, FINAL SUBDIVISION AND SATISFIED.
ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF NEW, I USE ORDINANCE FURTHER, THE PERFORMANCE BONDS, THE CLOCK RATE IMPROVEMENTS AND EXTENDS.
THEY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE.
AND WE DO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES AT THE APPLICATION WITH US TONIGHT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, UH, CLEAR THE PARTIAL WORDS HERE AND WHAT HAPPENED, WEYERHAEUSER, IT SEEMS LIKE DEJA VU.
WE WERE HERE JUST LAST MONTH WITH THE PRELIMINARY PREP BY THE APPROVAL.
UH, WAREHOUSER CONTINUES TO APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT.
THIS IS THE NEXT PHASE OF THE WEST NEIGHBORING PROJECT.
I'LL BE GLAD TO TRY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
UM, YOU'D HAVE TO ASK THE FOLKS AT BAILEY'S THAT, BUT I BELIEVE A FALL PROBABLY FALL BEFORE ANY KIND OF GROUNDBREAKING WOULD BE DONE FROM WHAT I WOULD GUESS AS ALWAYS KNOW.
WE'LL KNOW WHEN SOMETHING'S GOING TO BE BUILT AND STILL HAVE SOME SPECIAL USE PROJECT.
I MET APPLICATION YESTERDAY ON TIME.
SO I'LL GO TO THE JUNE FURTHER QUESTION ON THE BOARD AT THIS TIME.
IF THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD, FIND OUT, MAKE A MOTION.
I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAN THAT AS SUBMITTED BEFORE.
ONE BRIEF QUESTION I HAVE BEFORE.
AND I'LL SECOND THAT BEFORE I DO, WERE THERE ANY DEPARTMENT REVIEW COMMENTS? IT'S VERY, VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD.
SECOND MOTION, MOTION, AND SECOND.
[00:05:02]
YES, YES.[2.B. Kip Peregoy is requesting general subdivision plan approval for “Aston Subdivision at Carolina Colours”, a 127-lot subdivision. This multi-phase development is located on 48.54 +/- acres in the R8 Residential District. The site is located off Landscape Drive.]
ITEM B UNDERNEATH BUSINESS KIT, UH, PARAGUAY IS REQUESTING GENERAL SUBDIVISION PLAN OR SUBDIVISION AT CAROLINA TELLERS, EIGHT ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY SEVEN LOT SUBDIVISION.THIS IS MULTIPLE PHASE DEVELOPMENTS, 48.54 ACRES IN THE RTS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
THIS SITE IS LOCATED LANDSCAPE THAT WHEN WE GET AN APPLE.
THIS IS CAROLINE COLORED ON LANDSCAPE DRIVE BETWEEN ALL THE AIRPORT ROAD AND MONITORS GATEWAY.
LET'S SEE THE MASTERS SECOND, OTHER THAN 127 LAST 12.15 OPEN SPACE, 57 90 LINEAR FEET.
THE STREETS CITY UTILITIES GOT THE AREAS SORT OF ON EITHER END, BUT THESE THREE PARCELS LANDSCAPE GOT WATER ESCAPE FOR THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE WHEREVER YEAR OLDER VOICE COME IN THIS WAY.
THE COVER PAGE ON HERE, YOU SEE THAT TIES UP BETTER.
UH, DIVISION CAROLINE AND COLOR CONDITIONAL
BEEN SATISFIED ACCORDING TO CITY OF MAN, CITY OF NEWBORN LAND USE ORDINANCE
I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF MINOR CHANGES TO THE MAP AND I TALKED TO, UM, OH, IT WORKS AGAIN.
THE ONLY THING THAT GETS THE KIND OF WAITING DON'T MISS GETTING THE, UH, THE STORMWATER PERMITS IS PROBABLY, THEY HAD BEEN BEFORE THE BOARD A FEW TIMES IN THE PAST 10 YEARS, WHATEVER REASON WITH THE MARKET, THEY DECIDED NOT TO GO WITH IT.
SWAMP PERMITS HAD EXPIRED, BUT THEY NEED ALL BUYERS BEFORE THEY CAN START CONSTRUCTION.
ANYWAY, ANY OBJECTION AT THIS TIME, YOU'VE SEEN ANY IN HOPES OF GETTING THAT IS THERE ANYBODY HERE FROM THE PUBLIC TO HAVE LIFE, TO MAKE A COMMENT I'M HERE, UNLESS YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, THE NEW SCHOOLS COME IN AND HELP TAKE ALL THESE HITS.
ARE WE GOING TO GET A NEW SCHOOL? NO, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT THIS COMMITTEE, THIS NEIGHBORHOOD HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN THE MASTER PLAN TO BE BASICALLY STARTER HOMES.
AND THERE WILL BE A SIDEWALK ALL THE WAY DOWN LANDSCAPE DRIVE TO THE SCHOOL SO THAT THE CONCEPT WAS OLD TIME WALKING INTO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS.
SO THAT'S GOING TO BE STARTING HIM.
SO THAT'S GOING TO JUST BE CLEAR.
IT WILL HAVE TO BE APPOINTED TO DO CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT, FIVE FOOT SIDELINE SETBACKS.
YOU DON'T HAVE ANY ROOM INSTEAD OF ANY TREES, THERE WILL BE A BERM DOWN LANDSCAPE DRIVE, JUST LIKE IT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE, THAT WILL BE VEGETATED AND PLANTED LANDSCAPE.
SO THAT YOU'LL HAVE CONTINUITY ON BOTH SIDES OF LANDSCAPE.
DRIVE THE STORM WATER PERMIT THAT SETH TALKED ABOUT ALL THE WATER OUT OF THIS PROJECT STORM, WHERE IT GOES TO THE LAKE, THAT 26 ACRE LAKE.
AND SO IT'S REALLY NOT A NEW STORM WATER PERMIT.
IT'S A MODIFICATION TO AN EXISTING STORM WATER PERMIT.
THAT'S BEEN AROUND FOR A LONG TIME.
SO I HAVE ONLY TWO QUICK QUESTIONS.
UM, ONE WAS ABOUT STORMWATER PERMIT.
IS THAT A PROCESS FOR MODIFYING THE RENEWING THAT UNDERWAY? YES IT IS.
AND THEN THE SECOND THING IS UNDER THE ELECTRICAL COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW OR DEPARTMENT REVIEW, NUMBER FIVE, THEY ASKED FOR COPIES OF THE FINAL SITE PLANS, UH, WITH, UH, LOT NUMBERS AND LAYOUTS RUBIN AND PARCEL SAYS THAT 10 PROVIDED OR IS THAT NOT? WE'LL ALL HAVE
[00:10:01]
TO, THEY HAVE TO BE, CAUSE THEY PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THE CONDUITS UNDER THE STREETS THAT WE HAVE TO INSTALL.THAT WAS, UH, THE ONLY TWO QUESTIONS THAT I HAD, UM, FROM THE, UH, DEPARTMENT WHERE YOU COMMENTS ORIENTED KIDS, WHERE IS THIS? THE GREEN TOP? THAT'S THE SCHOOL.
OH, SO THIS WAS RIGHT BEHIND YOU GOT WATERSCAPE, WHICH IS CUT THROUGH
THIS ALWAYS AFTER BRINGS HIS VOICE WATER COMING OFF THAT PROPERTY, YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, THIS AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? THERE'S ALWAYS A COUPLE OF A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, I CALLED THE, UH, THE CITY, UH, ENGINEER AND ASKED HIM IF THERE WAS A WATER MAIN BREAK THERE.
AND HE EXPLAINED TO ME THAT THIS WATER, WHEN IT RAINS WATER ACCUMULATES THERE, AND IT ROLLS OVER THE CURB, IT'S THE GUN TO THAT NIGHT.
IT WAS, IF IT GOES OVER TO THE CURVE, IT GOES INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM, ALONG LANDSCAPE DRIVE DOWN INTO THE PIECE OF LAND, BUT IT'S A FLAT PIECE OF LAND AND THERE ARE INTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN THAT PIECE OF LAND, UH, THAT ACTUALLY BRING THE WATER UP TO THE, UH, IT GOES UNDER THE ROAD UP BY THE SCHOOL PROPERTY LINE.
THAT'S THE MAIN, MAIN DRAINAGE OUTLET FOR IT.
AND THEN DOWN ON THE OTHER END, THERE'S ALSO, UH, PIPES UNDER WATER STATE WAY.
UH, THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE DRAINS THE LOWER PORTION OF THAT.
THEY'RE ALL OLD WAREHOUSES, DITCHES, FORESTRY, OPERATION DITCHES.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING ITEM B? I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE SUBDIVISION PLAN FOR ESSENCE, SUBDIVISION TO CAROLINA COLORS AS PRESENTED SECOND MOTION.
[2.C. Robert Chiles Engineering on behalf of RAJDC NC properties is requesting general subdivision plan approval for a 2-lot subdivision located on 6.18 +/- acres in the I-1 Industrial District. The site is located at the intersection of Red Robin Lane and Garden Center Way.]
I HAVEN'T SEEN ROBERT CHILIS ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF RA RA J DC, NORTH CAROLINA PROPERTIES IS REQUESTING GENERAL SUBDIVISION PLAN APPROVAL FOR A TWO LOTS OF DIVISION LOCATED ON 6.1 ACRES IN THE I ONE INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT.THIS SIZE IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF RED ROBIN LANE AND GARDEN CENTER WAY.
SETH, CAN YOU GET AN OVERVIEW? YES, SIR.
ONE IS 4.3 5 8 3 2 1 0.73 ACRES NINE NEW STREETS, THE CITY UTILITIES.
IT WAS RIGHT OVER HERE NEXT TO THE ROAD.
YOU GOT GARDEN CENTER, WHATEVER YOUR CENTER LANE.
I BELIEVE THE AFRICAN THE PROPERTY OWNER, THE INTENT IS TO SELL THIS OFF.
PROBABLY BE SEEN IN THE CARWASH SITE PLAN.
I WAS GOING TO CALL IT 1700 TO RED ROBIN LANE DIVISION OF 1700 TO RED ROBIN LANE, J D CDMP PROPERTIES RECEIVE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL FROM THE CITY OF NEWBURN DEPARTMENT REVIEW FROM APRIL 27TH, 2022 MEETING TO HAVE IT REVIEWED.
BUT IT'S THAT VISION THAT ALL THE TECHNICAL LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL SUBDIVISION PLANNING, SATISFIED THE CITY RANDY'S ORDINANCE, THEREFORE PLAN APPROVAL 90, RIGHT? ROBIN LANE IS RECOMMENDED ROBERT CHILDS.
IF HE REPRESENTS THE APPLICATION, IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS SO YOU TO DO AWAY WITH A STEEL BUILDING AND WHAT USED TO BE THAT BEER PLACE AND A SUBDIVISION, NO BUILDING, THERE WAS A BUILDING THERE WE'RE CUTTING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT.
WE'RE CUTTING IT RIGHT THROUGH HERE.
JUST SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTY AND JUST KIND OF MAKING TWO OUT OF ONE.
IT WAS ORIGINALLY TWO, TWO TRACKS BACK IN THE DONALD TIME,
[00:15:02]
THE D DISSIPATE, A REZONING, UH, APPLICATION FOR, FOR EITHER OF THESE COMING THROUGH.WHAT WERE, WHERE ARE YOU WHERE YOU'RE AT? YOU'RE IN THE BUILDING.
MY INTENT IS TO DIVIDE THE PROPERTY, THE BUYER, THE SELLER DOES PROPERTY AND WHO SELLS IT TO THE BUYERS.
I BELIEVE THAT THAT'S THEIR INTENT, BUT, UH, I DON'T HAVE ANY CONTROL OR INPUT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER EITHER INTENDED IS A PERMITTED USE.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD? THIS POINT I WOULD LIKE TO, CAN I END TO DO SOME MODE? I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAN.
I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA.
[2.D. Boa Nguyen has requested consideration of an application to rezone one parcel of land totaling 0.76 +/- acres from C4 neighborhood business and R-6 residential districts (split zoning) to C3 commercial district. The parcel is located on Neuse Boulevard at its intersection with Midyette Avenue. The property is further identified as PID # 8-243-16000.]
ITEM D UNDER NEW BUSINESS BONE, THE WIND HAS REQUESTED CONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION TO REASON.ONE PARCEL OF LAND TOTAL 0.76 ACRES FROM C4 NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS AND OUR SIX RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS SPLIT ZONING TO C3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
THE PARCEL IS LOCATED ON NEW SCHOOL OF ART INTERSECTION.
WITH MANY OF ADAM, THE PROPERTY IS FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS EIGHT TATTOO, 43 TECH 1 6 0 0 0 INDIVIDUAL PARCELS THAT UNDERWENT ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY OF DUBAI DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REQUESTING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF OUR EIGHT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR 34, 12 AND 34 36.
I SKIPPED UH, THE PROPERTY IS FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS A TATTOO 43 TACK ON 6 0, 0 0.
CAN WE GET AN OVERVIEW? THANK YOU.
I SAID THE PROPERTY IS TWICE SEVEN, SIX ACRES.
IT IS IT'S RIGHT ON EAST BOULEVARD.
IT'S ONE OF THE RARE CASES WHERE THE ZONING MAP SPLIT UP A PIECE OF LAND IN THE PAST A LARGER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE MOBILE HOME PARK.
WELL, RECENTLY IT'S BEEN USED FOR STORAGE 22 TIRE BUSINESS NEXT DOOR IN THE SAME PROPERTY.
SO THAT'S WHAT I DO SEE IN THIS PORTION.
AND THIS PORTION UP HERE FOR, OKAY, C4
THEIR TRICK IS TO ENCOURAGE CONTINUED USE OF LAND FOR RESIDENCE, ALLOWING FAMILY TO FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS, A SMALLER LOT, 6,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUM.
AND THEN CERTAINLY WHAT THE PROPOSING C3 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT ESTABLISHED AS A NURSE FOR OFFICES, PERSONS SERVICES AND RETAILING, DURABLE GOODS.
IF YOU CAN DOWN WOULD BE LOCATED ON CITY MAJOR RADIO ROADS BECAUSE OF YOUR VOLUME OF TRAFFIC ARTERIES, AMPLE OPPORTUNITY, PARKING CONTROLLED TRAFFIC, UH, APPROPRIATELY.
UM, LOW TRAFFIC RETAIL ARE BIG.
THEY GOT ITEMS LIKE REFRIGERATORS OR BEDDING.
[00:20:01]
WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN CAR CARWASH, RESTAURANTS, OFFICES, ENCLOSED STORES, GAS, THEM SALES, AUTOMOBILE SALES, AND SERVICE.SO THE SURROUNDING ZONINGS, WE TALKED ABOUT C4 AND EVERY BUSINESS TO THE NORTH, UM, FOUND MY IMAGE OF THAT TO THE SOUTH DIRECTLY, RESIDENTIAL OUR 15 BEYOND THE RIGHT OF WAY TO THE EASTBOUND ON EAST BOULEVARD, VACANT LAND ACROSS THE STREET C4 BEYOND THE RIGHT OF WAY DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS THE MEMO ON PARK.
THAT IS, I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT USED TO BE A PART OF CITY CITY UTILITIES WE'VE PROVIDED REGIONAL LAND USE PLAN.
INSTEAD OF THAT PROPERTY HAVE A HIGH SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT AND SHANNON AS DEVELOPED WITH A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARD ON THE PROPERTY.
AND ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD PLAIN MAPPING PROGRAM IS POVERTY IS NOT IN THE A HUNDRED PLANE, A HUNDRED YEAR OR 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN.
SO THAT RECOMMENDATION AND PROPOSED PROPOSAL, THE REASON I SAID THAT
HE TALKS ABOUT THE EXISTING TIRE STORES SERVICE CENTER, WHICH IS A PERMITTED DECENCY, THREE COMMERCIAL ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO THE NORTH AND THE EAST ACROSS THESE FOUR BOULEVARDS DECIDE TO SEPARATE FROM THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH ON MIDGET AVENUE, PUBLIC STREET, ADJACENT OVERLAND PARK TO THE WEST WILL BE SCREENED BY AN OPAQUE BUFFER IN ANY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO, THE APARTMENT THROUGH THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS QUITE BY THE VENUE ORDINANCE.
THEY ASKED DOWN THE PROPOSED REGION TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS DUE TO THE PARTS OF BEING SPLIT ZONE CURRENTLY AND ONLY MODERATELY SEE THAT THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THAT.
IF WE'RE READY FOR, FOR DISCUSSION.
I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, SETH.
SO, UM, I THINK THE USE, I REALIZE THIS IS A REZONING, BUT JUST KIND OF THINKING AHEAD A LITTLE BIT AND TALKING THROUGH THIS, THE USE THAT IS IDENTIFIED, UM, BY THE APPLICANT WOULD BE, UH, I THINK 10.2 10, IS THAT MAYBE A CLOSED THAT MANY STORES, ALL STORAGE, ALL STORAGE WITHIN ENCLOSED, UH, COMPLETELY ENCLOSED STRUCTURES.
SO NO ISSUE THERE, IF SO NOW OUR OUTDOOR OUTDOOR SERVICES, THAT'S THE KEY BECAUSE THEY'LL GET OUTDOOR STORAGE THAT KICKS IT TO, UH, 10 TO 20, WHICH THEN REQUIRED A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN C3.
UM, AND SO, UM, I DON'T WANT THE PROBLEM WITH THE REZONING.
AND SO I'LL, I'LL HAPPILY MAKE THAT MOTION WHEN IT COMES BACK.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM, WHEN THAT COMES BACK AROUND TO STAFF, THAT, THAT EVERYBODY IS THINKING THROUGH THAT IF OUTSIDE STORAGE IS INCLUDED, THAT KICKS IT TO A SPECIAL USE.
UNDER A C3 AND IT'S NOT PERMITTED, UH, EITHER THOSE USES IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER C4, WHICH IS THE ADJACENT, UM, C3 AND C4 COMPATIBLE.
UM, THAT'S, THAT'S REALLY MY ONLY COMMENT OTHER THAN THAT STUFF APPLICATION, LET'S GET BLACKSIDE RESIDENTIAL LIVING NEXT DOOR AT THIS TIME.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS IN THE WAR? WELL, I'M CURIOUS, HOW DOES IT AFFECT THE ASSESSMENT? WAS THE PROPER ASSESSMENT INCREASE OR UNPACK THE ASSESSMENT THAT, YEAH, I'D HAVE TO CHECK WITH THE COUNTY TAX OFFICE.
I'M NOT SURE ABOUT ANY IMPACTS OF THIS.
HE TALKING ABOUT THE VALUE OF GOING UP IF IT'S THE TAXABLE BY.
I THINK THAT DOES CARRY A DIFFERENT, UM, C3 CARRIES A DIFFERENT, UM, I THINK IT WOULD INCREASE THE TAX VALUE, BUT IT DOES, IT DOES CARRY A DIFFERENT, UM, RATE.
BUT I WOULD THINK WITH THE LAND BEING VACANT, WHATEVER IMPROVEMENTS THEORETICALLY
[00:25:01]
WOULD IMPROVE AND INCREASE THE BACKSIDE.IF THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA ITEM B WHERE HONOR IS A REZONING, JUST IN THE SPIRIT OF CLARITY.
I THINK MR. LACKEY MOTION IS TO RECOMMEND I TO RECOMMEND PASSAGE OF AGENDA ITEM TO RESOLVE THAT RECOMMENDATION OF MORE INVOLVEMENT.
I GUESS THIS WILL BE AS IS A REZONING.
THIS WOULD BE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD THAT THEY SHOULD APPROVE THE ZONING OF THIS PARCEL AS LAID OUT BEFORE I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, OR ITEM D WHEN WE GET A ROLL CALL QUICK.
[2.E. Development Services is requesting consideration of two initial zoning designations for individual parcels that underwent annexation into the City of New Bern. Development Services is requesting the zoning designation of R-8 residential district for 3412 and 3436 Old Airport Road.]
I AM DEVELOPING SERVICES REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF TWO MINUTES AND VOTING DESTINATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL PARCEL, BUT UNDERWENT AN ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY AT ALL THE SERVICES ZONING EIGHT RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND 34 36 OLD AIRPORT ROAD.PROPERTY ANNEX, INITIAL ZONING AS PART OF THAT PROCESS, WHATEVER REASON IF IT'S NOT DONE WITH THESE TWO PIECES.
PRESENT IS IDENTIFIED AS, UM, CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER DONE CLASSIFICATION.
THESE ARE THE TWO SUBJECT PROPERTIES.
A GREAT DEAL OF RA ARE 15 SOUTH IN DISCUSSIONS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS.
THEY VERY MUCH LIKE TO HAVE RA ALREADY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS, A MINIMUM OF 8,000 SQUARE FEET PER LOT FOR ONE UNIT 4,000 SQUARE FEET FOR ANY ADDITIONAL UNITS.
THE FAMILY DENSITY IS APPROXIMATELY 60 MINUTES PER DAY FOR AECOM BASED ON A FIVE ACRE TRACK USES AN RA, THE SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DUPLEX.
DOES THAT MEAN TO THE NORTH IS THE COUNTY JURISDICTION, 15 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT EAST RESIDENTIAL RA RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE WEST COUNTY CITY OF MRS. RODRIGUEZ.
THEY WENT THROUGH ANNEXATION WAS TO GET CITIES TO WORK FOR THE PROPERTIES.
UM, THE PUZZLES IS OUT OF THE SUBJECT.
PROPERTIES ARE A RESIDENTIAL DATA.
THAT'S CONSISTENT WITH THE CHARACTER OF THE ADJACENT LAND USES AND DEVIN CLASSIFICATIONS.
THEY HAVE PROVIDERS THAT NEED TO BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY RANDY'S CONNOTATION.
ZACK HAS SPOKEN BOTH PROPERTY OWNERS, PREFERRED STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS INITIATIVE.
WE HAVEN'T TAKEN AIRPORT ROAD.
WE'VE HAD ISSUES WITH THE WATER FLOW RATE IN WATER.
HOW WAS THAT PROCESS GOING? BUT THEY WANT TO IMPROVE THE WATERPARK CONSTRUCTION SITE OR CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, MR. BLACK, THIS IS THE PROJECT, THE CITY ENGINEER, AND SEVERAL OTHERS THAT ARE WORKING ON.
UM, I DO HAVE AN UPDATE ABOUT THAT.
IF ANYBODY'S INTERESTED IN THAT, I GAVE EVERYBODY A COPY OF THE PROJECT PLANS.
[00:30:02]
THE SOUTH WEST WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS STILL MOVING ALONG FOR ESTABLISHING THE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PLANS COMPLETE.GUESS WHAT YOU GUYS HAVE SUBMITTED FOR THE NECESSARY NCPDP PERMITS.
ONCE YOU GET THE PERMITS BACK, HE HOPES IT'S THE MIDDLE OF THIS MONTH ADVERTISE THE PROJECT FOR THE, SO THE EASTERN ISSUE HAS BEEN SOLVED.
WELL, THE WATER PRESSURE REPORTS BEFORE ENDED UP BEING RELATED TO A COUPLE OF BAD PROBLEMS WITH A BACKUP TO A THOUSAND PSI, HE'S HOPING THAT BE 1400 PSI WITNESSES DOWN TOWARD THE TOP OF THE SYSTEM, 1800.
YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT THAT BUTTERFLY VALVES ARE THEY, THERE WAS ONE THAT HAD A, UH, IT WAS ELECTRIC, SOMETHING TO DO WITH ELECTRONIC.
I'VE HEARD A COUPLE WORD FAULTY.
SO THEY WENT IN THERE AND KIND OF TRACK BACK AND FIGURE IT OUT WHERE THE FAULTY PARTS WERE AND WENT BACK AND TESTED THEM BEFORE.
JORDAN, LET ME KNOW THAT YOU DIDN'T WORK FOR THE DEVELOPERS FOR SHAMBERG, WHICH CAME BEFORE US, JUST IN ALASKA, UH, MEETING AND SO ON THE DESIGN OF A NEW WATER SYSTEM.
AND DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS SECTION, JORDAN PINELLA, MAKING A CONNECTION ON WILCOX ROAD, WALKED THE WILCOX RIGHT TANK THROUGH THE SHANDRA INTERSECTION INTO EXISTING BAYBERRY SECTION REPORT BY PEOPLE, HAVING SOME ISSUES, MAKING THIS CONNECTION WILL IMPROVE THE SYSTEM, FLUSHING CAPABILITIES, BUT ALSO INCREASE THEIR SUPPLY TO THE AREA.
UM, SO YOU'RE STILL ON TRACK TO BID THE PROJECT.
AND I ALWAYS SUMMER STARTED CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION LATER AS WELL.
I'VE GOT HIS DIRECT LINE HERE.
IF ANYBODY WANTS TO TAKE SO MANY DETAILS THAT I'M UNDERSTANDING WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT ASPECTS.
AND I ASK THEM, WHAT IS IT ABOUT THIS TAKES THE WRONG FRONT PAGE HERE.
THE PROPERTY GOES THROUGH A LARGE AREA OF UNDEVELOPED LAND AND CARROTS, CAROLINA COLORS.
AND I HAVE THIS BOTTOM LINE GO THROUGH, GET UP AND OVER THE POLITICS HAD TO AGREE TO A PERMANENT PLAN OF HOW THIS SOMEWHAT, AT LEAST HAVE PROPERTIES CAN BE LAID OUT, WHICH TOOK A GREAT DEAL OF GOING BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN NAVIGATING TO GET OFF THEIR FUTURE FLEXIBILITY ON HOW THEY WANT TO LAY OUT SUBDIVISIONS.
WHAT THEY CAME UP WITH IS THE PATH FOR A ROAD THAT WILL SOMEDAY GO THROUGH, AND THIS IS GOING TO GO DOWN ALONG THE EDGE OF IT.
SO IT TOOK A WHILE TO NEGOTIATE WHERE THAT WAS GOING TO GO BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE CAROLINA FELLERS PROPERTY OWNERS OVER THE COMPANY.
AND THEN TO GETTING THE WATER PERMITS FROM THE STATE IS A CONFERENCING AT THE BEGINNING.
I APPRECIATE HIM TAKING THE TIME TO COME RUN THIS GROUND FOR US AS A BOARD.
AND WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.
SO FOR THE INITIAL ZONING, UH, REQUESTS THAT WE HAVE BEFORE US, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE INITIAL ZONING FOR SEVEN PARCEL IDS, SEVEN DASH ONE FIVE DASH 0 1 7 AND PARCEL SEVEN DASH 105 DASH 0 2 0.
BOTH FOR THE INITIAL PRESENTING DESTINATION OF PARTY.
WE'VE CONDUCTED ALL THE NEW BUSINESS AND TURN IT OVER TO MR. SHELDON, GIVE US, GIVE US A, UH, LAND USE PLAN UPDATE IF YOU DON'T MIND, SIR.
UM, WE HAVE HAD SOME EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS WITH CONSULTANTS, UM, BUT ONLY WITH REGARD TO THE DEADLINES
[00:35:01]
IN THE SCHEDULE.SO, UH, WITH THAT IN MIND, UM, IT'S CLEAR THAT, UH, HE NEEDS TO HAVE THE PLAN DONE BY A FINAL VERSION OF THE PLAN, UH, DONE BY MAY 24TH IN ORDER TO SUBMIT THAT TO YOU FOR YOUR, FOR, FOR YOUR SPECIAL, SOON TO BE CALLED SPECIAL MEETING, UH, ON MAY 31ST OR THEREABOUTS, DEPENDING HOW YOU DECIDE.
UM, AND THEN, UH, ONCE YOU'VE HAD YOUR MEETING AND HAD YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS, THEN IT WILL GO TO THE ALDERMAN.
UM, AND THERE A DEADLINE IS JUNE 3RD IN ORDER TO, UH, BE PRESENTED AT 30 JUNE 14TH MEETING FOR A CALL FOR I'M SORRY.
NO, THAT, UH, FOR THE JUNE 14TH MEETING FOR THEIR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
UH, AND THEN, UH, HOPEFULLY IT'S EITHER ADOPTED AT THAT MEETING OR IF SOME THING COMES ALONG THE WAY WE HAVE, UH, PROVIDED IN THE PLAN TO STILL HAVE ONE MORE MEETING IN JUNE WITH THE ALDERMAN, UH, TO ALLOW FOR, UM, UH, SOMETHING TO COME UP AND THEN WE HAD A CUSHION.
SO TO THAT, UH, SO THAT THEY COULD ADOPT IT THEN ALONG JUNE 28.
SO MATT, IS IT THE INTENT WHEN ASSUMING STAFF RECEIVES THE FILE DRAFT OR MAY 24TH WILL BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE A P AND Z BOARD AT THAT, ON THAT DAY AS WELL IN ANTICIPATION OF A SPECIAL CALL MEETING ON MAY 31ST? YES, I SUPPOSE, YES.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE WORKING SESSION TELLING ME WORK AND DEVELOPMENT OF THIS.
SO AS FAR AS I KNOW, NONE, I MEAN, YOUR SESSION THAT YOU HAD WITH THEM WAS IT, THAT WAS THE NIGHT, RIGHT? SO WE'VE HAD NO SUCCESS GETTING TO TALK TO THEM ABOUT GETTING MEETINGS WITH YOU OR ANYONE FOR THAT.
WAS THERE ANY SORT OF PERFORMANCE THAT THEY WERE REQUIRED TO? UH, YOU KNOW, SO THEIR CONTRACT IS BASICALLY THE TERMS FOR THE, FOR THE WORK.
UM, AND SO, UM, THEY DID HAVE AN INITIAL MEETING, WHAT THEY CALLED THE KICKOFF MEETING EVEN BEFORE YOUR MEETING AND THEN YOUR MEETING, UH, COUNTED FOR THEIR CONTRACT AS A WORK SESSION.
SO IT'S QUITE POSSIBLE THAT THAT MIGHT BE IT.
IS THERE A LEGEND LEGISLATIVE, UM, DEADLINE FOR APPROVAL OF THIS BY THE CITY I PRESENTED THERE IS ENERGY.
HAVE YOU SEEN ANY DRAFTS SINCE I'VE JUST COMMUNICATED WITH YOU ALL OF MY INFORMATION, BUT AT LEAST THEY HAD AGREED TO THE SCHEDULE.
I MEAN, IF WE HAD NOT EVEN HEARD ANYTHING, WE WOULD STILL BE WONDERING, SO YOU'LL LOOK AND YOU'LL ALSO GET TO SEE THEIR PRESENTATION AT BED, UH, AT YOUR, UH, AT YOUR NEXT MEETING.
SO THERE'LL BE NO TIME, BUT THERE'LL BE ANY CORRECTIONS OR ANYTHING BEFORE WE HAVE TO PUSH IT DOWN THE LINE, YOU'RE INVITED TO SHOCK ON THE WEDDING.
WHAT I WOULD ANTICIPATE IS, I MEAN, THAT'S A PRETTY LIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME TO REVIEW THE DOCUMENT, BUT YOU CAN REVIEW THE DOCUMENT.
AND IF WE HAVE ANY, UM, SERIES OF REVISIONS THAT WE FEEL ARE NECESSARY, WE CAN, THAT CAN BE A CONTINGENCY OF OUR RECOMMENDATION TO IMPROVE THAT.
OR IF MAYBE WE DON'T LIKE IT, LET ME SAY RECOMMENDATION, NOT TO PRODUCTION, WOULDN'T TAKE THAT WHAT HAPPENED, BUT, UH, WE CAN MAKE THOSE CONTINGENCIES, UM, FOR THE BOARD OF ALDERMAN TO REVIEW AND THEN THEY CAN CHOOSE HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM, HOW THEY CHOOSE TO DEAL WITH THAT'S CORRECT.
I MEAN, I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE, I FEEL THE SAME WAY, BUT I THINK IT'S A, THE SCHEDULE IS WHAT THE SCHEDULE IS AT THIS POINT.
SO WE'LL, WE'LL HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT AS A GROUP AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL TO THOSE FORTH AND TO ALL WE COMPELLED BY THE ZONING BOARD ONES THAT WHEN WE HAVE TO APPROVE IT AS WELL, THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, IF THE STAFF, THE, WE WERE NOT COMPELLED TO RECOMMEND
[00:40:01]
THE APPROVAL.SO WE'RE OBVIOUSLY NOT, I'LL SAY IT GIVES THE BOARD INVOLVEMENT.
WE COULD RECOMMEND THAT THEY NOT APPROVE IT.
UM, BUT THEY SEEM UNLIKELY GIVEN THE LEGISLATIVE DEADLINE THAT WON'T HAVE TIME TO WRITE WELL.
AND I WOULD PRESUME THAT THE BOARD OF ALDERMAN IS LIKELY TO SEE IT ALL AROUND ALL AROUND THE MAY 24TH AS WELL.
THIS COMES UP EDITING ONCE EVERY 10 YEARS.
I UNDERSTAND WITH A DOCUMENT THAT'S TRUE.
THAT CAN BE CHANGED AFTER THE BATH.
UM, ANY PROPOSED CHANGES THIS POINT IN TIME.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, CONCERNS, COMMENTS BY COMMOTION, WE ADJOURN.